Get in touch with us for inquiries, collaborations, or service requests.
Our team will respond as soon as possible.
News
Bladeless Trocar vs Classic Trocar | Key Differences & Selection Guide
Bladeless Trocar vs Classic Trocar: Key Differences and Selection Considerations
This article compares bladeless trocars and classic trocars, explaining their structural differences, typical use cases, and key considerations for laparoscopic access device selection in minimally invasive surgery workflows.
Understanding Trocar Selection in Laparoscopic Surgery
In laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), trocars are essential access devices used to establish and maintain instrument entry points. Among the most commonly used options are classic trocars and bladeless trocars.
While both serve the same fundamental purpose, their design approaches and handling characteristics differ, making each suitable for different procedural preferences and workflow requirements.
What Is a Classic Trocar?
A classic trocar features a traditional trocar structure designed to puncture tissue and establish a controlled access channel for laparoscopic instruments. It is widely used in routine laparoscopic procedures and commonly incorporates an integrated valve system to support air leakage control during instrument exchange.
Classic trocars are typically available in standardized diameters such as 5 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm, supporting compatibility with commonly used laparoscopic instruments.
What Is a Bladeless Trocar?
A bladeless trocar is designed to establish laparoscopic access by separating tissue layers rather than cutting them with a blade. This design approach supports controlled insertion and is often selected for procedures where tissue separation techniques are preferred.
Bladeless trocars are commonly used in modern MIS workflows and are available in multiple sizes to accommodate standard laparoscopic instruments.
Key Differences Between Bladeless and Classic Trocars
Design Approach
Classic trocars use a traditional puncture-based design, while bladeless trocars rely on tissue separation mechanisms during insertion.
Insertion Characteristics
Bladeless trocars are often selected for controlled insertion techniques, whereas classic trocars are commonly used in standardized, routine access workflows.
Workflow Preference
The choice between bladeless and classic trocars often depends on surgeon preference, institutional protocols, and established laparoscopic workflow standards.
How to Choose Between Bladeless and Classic Trocars
When selecting between bladeless and classic trocars, buyers and clinical engineers typically evaluate:
- Procedure type and access requirements
- Preferred insertion technique
- Instrument compatibility and diameter
- Single-use or reusable configuration
- Regulatory and procurement requirements
- OEM or private labeling availability
Both trocar types are widely adopted in global laparoscopic markets and are commonly supplied through OEM and distributor programs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between bladeless and classic trocars?
The main difference lies in their design approach: classic trocars use a traditional puncture method, while bladeless trocars are designed to separate tissue during insertion.
Are both trocar types used in laparoscopic surgery?
Yes, both bladeless and classic trocars are commonly used in laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery workflows.
Are bladeless trocars single-use?
Many bladeless trocars are designed as single-use devices, although availability may vary depending on manufacturer and market requirements.